Post 538 – Uncle Chico Newsletter # 206 Three very clear and objective statements from CAFIB members, Messrs. Américo Cardoso dos Santos Jr. (KennelAraguaya), Fabiano Nunes (Kennel Jawa) and Dr. Paulo Angotti (Kennel Ibituruna), who had FBs of their breeding kennels unduly involved in possible falsification and/or adulteration of pedigrees in the always omitted CBKC-FCI [ only in the FB case of the FB ], which have not yet been duly clarified and, by the way, I think will never be. (*) – Data: Jan, 11th – 2018

Uncle Chico Newsletter # 206

Three very clear and objective statements from CAFIB members, Messrs. Américo Cardoso dos Santos Jr. (Kennel Araguaya), Fabiano Nunes (Kennel Jawa) and Dr. Paulo Angotti (Kennel Ibituruna), who had FBs of their breeding kennels unduly involved in possible falsification and/or adulteration of pedigrees in the always omitted CBKC-FCI [ only in the FB case of the FB ],  which have not yet been duly clarified and,  by the way,  I think will never be. (*)

Dear Fila Brasileiro (FB) and CAFIB friends,

1 – I think that everybody agrees that the three statements below received above from Messrs. Américo Cardoso dos Santos Jr. (Kennel Araguaya), Fabiano Nunes (Kennel Jawa) and Dr. Paulo Angotti (Kennel Ibituruna), all of them very traditional, know and important CAFIB members, put an end in this subject brought to the surface by Uncle Chico in his last articles #  203, 204 and 205, since they attest that never ask or authorized anyone to register FBs born in their kennels and much less change the name of these FBs in any other Kennel Club.

My dear friends,

2 – In view of the above statements, I ask: did the three “posters” mentioned in my previous articles act in an ETHICAL way when requesting the pedigrees I questioned in the CBKC-FCI ?  And these two clubs issued them with ethics, supervision, verification, control, correction and attesting the truth of the facts? As a notary public is obliged to do? And, also, respecting the  FCI Statute ?

3 – To these statements so conclusive above, I remember two more, to which there was no attempt of denial by the three “posters“:

3.1.  that the statement made by CAFIB, mentioned at the beginning of my article # 203, that “… Anfibra, a club that was formed from the theft of part of CAFIB assets and patrimony (see CAFIB’s official complaint in http://www.cafibbrasil.com/leitor_not/items/cafib-official-report-to-owners-and-breeders-of-fila-brasileiro-in-brazil-and-abroad.html and in http://www.cafibbrasil.com/leitor_not/items/expulsion-or-self-dismissal-of-former-directors-of-cafib.html )…” ;

3.2. and also my statement that Anfibra developed “… all its activities up to the age of three years of existence, such as organized exhibitions and even sold pedigrees, without having its own Breed Standard …” ; to which I add now: for this I am also affectionately called the Father of the Anfibra Standard, which I am very proud of, since for six consecutive months I vehemently request the elaboration of such Standard.

4 – As the three “posters” were not able to explain a so simple subject, the post below created by Mr. Flavio Pires, owner of Kennel Palmares, simplifies and summarizes with much creativity and objectivity the questions never answered by them:

5 – In addition, I understand that each person should question or denounce any irregularities that they suspect or understand that really exist. In my case about FBs and/or their ancestry they are being used outside CAFIB. I thought that I should ask these questions, because I believe that there were changes at the CBKC-FCI pedigrees of breeder name, name of FBs breed by CAFIB members and, also, inclusion of ancestry. Nothing more than that. The breeders I questioned tried to justify themselves, but they could not … And the three statements above put an end to these issues. Too bad, I’m sorry. If the three “posters” had been able to immediately prove the correctness of their actions, they would have done much less harm to the Fila Brasileiro.

(*) My dear friends, to know all the facts in English, just click on:

– “Uncle Chico Newsletter # 203” whose link is https://filabrasileirochicopeltierblog.wordpress.com/2018/01/08/post-534-uncle-chico-newsletter-204-commenting-on-the-email-received-january-4-from-mr-olegario-bretas-on-my-article-uncle-chico-newsletter-203-date-jan-6th-2018/ ;
– “Uncle Chico Newsletter # 204” whose link is
https://filabrasileirochicopeltierblog.wordpress.com/2018/01/08/post-534-uncle-chico-newsletter-204-commenting-on-the-email-received-january-4-from-mr-olegario-bretas-on-my-article-uncle-chico-newsletter-203-date-jan-6th-2018/ ;
– “Uncle Chico Newsletter # 205” whose link is
https://filabrasileirochicopeltierblog.wordpress.com/2018/01/12/post-536-uncle-chico-newsletter-205-commenting-on-the-repercussion-and-three-posts-about-my-article-uncle-chico-newsletter-203-date-jan11th-2018/ .

Best regards, Chico Peltier.

Anúncios