Ask Uncle Chico nº 149
Jan Kubesa, the gravedigger who unearthed the truth: the Standard used
by Anfibra is the CAFIB Standard !!!
According to the Brazilian Law, the CAFIB Standard and the articles published
in the O FILA Journal are CAFIB property.
Andre Coltre, Mariana Dudeck and Renato Ferreira da Rocha have already argued
against Uncle Chico`s three articles?
Dear CAFIB friends, continuing with our conversations …
- Uncle Chico, has Anfibra officially positioned itself on what racial Standard this club uses? Do you agree with Jan Kubesa’s statement that the CAFIB Standard and the articles published in the O FILA Journal are “…spiritual heritage of humanity…” or do they belong to CAFIB?
First Response of Uncle Chico:
At the beginning of its foundation, I obviously thought that Anfibra, like any specialized and independent Fila club in the world, that even registers or should register its dogs, and squad would elaborate its own racial Standard or even ask CAFIB to borrow and license the CAFIB Standard that is accepted and recognized worldwide.
Although this answer is very simple – or whether or not you have your own Standard – this novel has been going on for some three years.
And obviously raised many suspicions…
If in fact this club had its own Standard, it would have to put it on Anfibra`s facebook and website and would end this long novel…
In the same way that the Anfibra members post several other subjects much less important and totally irrelevant:
Why do they post so many self-praise to their “guide-tip” friends as if they were in a social club and do not post technical issues about the preservation of the Fila Brasileiro, its Standard, breeding innovations, do not propose changes in Temperament Test, etc …? If they really want to preserve the PURE Fila Brasileiro, why do not they fight the “mestizo-filas”, the Neo Apologists of Miscegenation (NAM’s) and the “freak-fila” ? Why do not they denounce “mestizos-filas” by educating the eyes of their associates and “fileiros” in general, including the CBKC, through photos published on their website and facebook, so that they learn to differentiate a Pure Fila from a mestizo one ? Why not elaborate a visual work regarding the miscegenation in the Fila Brasileiro and better than the one done by the Canil Itanhandu with the support of Jonas Tadeu Iacovantuono, as Fernando Zanetti told us that would do it 4 years ago? Why, on the contrary, did they submit their still CAFIB born Filas – to the judgement of CBKC judges at an SPFB expo held in Jacareí, SP ? Why did they subject these CAFIB origin Filas to the CBKC Standard judgment that they criticized so much ? Why do they only post so many “lets go, lets go…”, “lol lol lol…” and “kkkkkk …” and do not post their Standard which is the most important regulation and guideline that any serious club and breeder should follow?
After all, why only try to copy what CAFIB does almost 40 years ago ??? !!!
Where are the innovations promised by this club when it was founded?
Were they just promises to steal CAFIB members and destroy CAFIB?
This is why they have been left speechless and cannot explain recently to Mariana Dudeck and Renato Rocha (two Brazilians “black-filas” lovers) why Anfibra does not accept the so-called “black-fila” on their club… Then they set out for arrogant answers, which increased mistrust on the inexistence of the Anfibra Standard.
Well, this attitude is not worthy of a serious club.
I explain:
Initially Anfibra founders claimed that they used something called “Fila Padrão (note: in English = Fila Standard) which was never described by Anfibra and was not defined, presented, discussed and accepted by breeders. They then reported that they used the “PSC Standard“, which in fact is all about the Standard elaborated by Dr. Paulo Santos Cruz, Erwin Waldemar Rathsam and João Ebner for KCP (Kennel Club de Sao Paulo) and former BKC in the 50’s and who accepted the “black-fila“. Soon, stumbling on its untruths, Anfibra went without a logical explanation as to why this club would not accept the “black-fila” from Mariana Dudeck and Renato Rocha kennel.
Well, if Anfibra refused to accept the “black-fila” breed by Andre Coltre, Mariana Dudeck and Renato Rocha, it is plausible to reason that they actually used the CAFIB Standard, the only Fila Brasileiro Standard in the world that does not accept the “black-fila“…
On last Dec, 27th Joaquim – Quinzinho – Liberato Barroso posted a long article in his face and in no line answered the simple question done by Uncle Chico: what is the Standard used by Anfibra? This article resulted in my reply sent directly to Quinzinho`s email and soon afterwards spread via email and later posted on my blog (see
https://filabrasileirochicopeltierblog.wordpress.com/2017/01/03/post-n-448-uncle-chico-newsletter-168-email-sent-last-dec-29th-in-portuguese-directly-to-the-electronic-address-of-mr-joaquim-quinzinho-liberato-barroso-remarking-on-his-r/ ).
Then pressed by the articles that followed with vehement and insistent charges of Uncle Chico (see in my blog clicking on https://filabrasileirochicopeltierblog.wordpress.com/ mainly posts # 438, 440, 442 and 444, among many others) Anfibra’s secretary, Francisco Fornel, posted on the official website of this club that Anfibra has a standard of its own but this is not posted on the Anfibra facebook and website, because in three years of existence, Anfibra has not yet had time to post “because our website is still under construction“… — Could you believe on that ? And then Fornel state also that Anfibra has a Standard only printed on paper, which could be sent to the members who asked for it (!!! ???). So I understood that there are members of this club which are not interested in knowing its own Standard by which they breed and expose? Such post seems to me very confusing and strange… Do you agree with me ?
Curiously and interestingly without combining the script of the novel, soon after in last Dec, 28th Jan Kubesa (a breeder based in Theca Republic) confirms in this same facebook what the great majority of the “fileiros” already knew: the Anfibra does not have a Standard !!! And uses the CAFIB Standard !!! Owned by CAFIB without proper authorization and license. Probably as a shame to admit this fact that I understand is really very embarrassing. That is, Jan Kubesa as a gravedigger of Anfibra unearthed the truth hitherto not admitted by the other founders of Anfibra. And confirms that Anfibra is the only specialized and independent dog club in the world that does not have its own Standard and, sneakily and hidden uses CAFIB Standard without asking for a license … I think probably due to the lack of technical and historical knowledge of their board Anfibra were not able to work out its own Standard.
That is, since its foundation, Anfibra do not show any respected for its own members, exhibitors and sympathizers, since it has never informed transparently that Anfibra, a club that said that it came to innovate and modify the Fila Brasileiro breeding, does not even have its own Standard .. .
What a deception !!!
2nd Response of Uncle Chico (on ownership of the Standard and other assets and assets of CAFIB):
But the tragicomic sequence of errors unfortunately does not end there.
Jan Kubesa, citing the great German scientist Albert Einstein, posted on last Dec, 28 in the Anfibra facebook, in order to exemplify that the Theory of Relativity formulated by this scientist has no owner but would be part of what Jan Kubesa calls of “…the spiritual heritage of humanity“. Trying to justify his lame and hilarious understanding, Jan Kubesa also states that when Dr. Paulo Santos Cruz published his article titled “How to Distinguish a Pure Fila of a Mestizo” in the newspaper owned by CAFIB named O FILA, this article would also be part of such “… spiritual heritage of humanity“.
The Brazilian Law and I disagree frontally with the gravedigger Jan Kubesa who finally unearthed the truth about the non-existence of the Anfibra Standard.
Any and every invention and / or human creation does have an owner, provided it has been registered or it is based in the public knowledge. Its owner may be a scientist; a firm for which he worked and, under contract, developed his invention; It can also be a University or even the Country that gave conditions for certain theory and research to develop and succeed.
The case of this article is purposely “mixed” in this subject, in the same way that the first cross-breeder, “mixed” the Fila Brasileiro in the past with other breeds. Because it has nothing to do with a registered Standard with a published article in a magazine owned by CAFIB…
Every article published in a magazine has author as well as owner. The latter can be the one that signs it or the vehicle in which it was edited.
Now, my friends, try to misappropriate an article by some author and edit it in another book or magazine or use it for any purpose. Of course, you will be illegally appropriating assets, property and the creation of third parties.
That is, when Anfibra admits, via Jan Kubesa and does not officially deny it, that uses the CAFIB Standard without authorization, rather committing a crime of misappropriation.
I think that because Jan Kubesa was born in Eastern Europe still under the influence of the former Soviet Union, he still finds it very difficult to adapt to the fact that the State is no longer unique “Lord Almighty“, that the civilized world respects and values ideas, creations and private property; contrary to what had been happening in Cuba at the time of Fidel Castro and still occurs in Venezuela of the terrible double Hugo Chavez and his successor Nicolás Maduro. In Brazil we respect people as well as their ideas and properties. No other property should be used without the proper authorization of its owner.
But I’d rather not dwell on this absurdity. Certainly the CAFIB will soon officially take a stand in this respect.
I remembered all my readers that whenever I mentioned on my website and blog the books of Paulo Godinho, Inês Van Damme and Toninho Linhares Borges and articles by Américo Cardoso, José Souto Maior Borges, Airton Campbell, Luiz Maciel, O FILA CAFIB Journal and others, I always asked for authorization and duly inform my readers the name of the real author of each of these works and properties.
Uncle Chico does not steal property and assets from other people, clubs or third party !!!
When I publish and post photos I only do it with photos in the “no restriction” format and have already been posted on the web, as directed by three lawyers consulted, my website and blog are for educational purposes and have absolutely no commercial purpose , in full compliance with the Brazilian Law.
I would also like to inform that since the Anfibra founders did not participate in the first and most difficult CAFIB years, they should not know that the CAFIB Standard was published in 1979 in our newspaper O FILA and was published on the poster sponsored by Purina and registered in 1980 at Brazilian Ministry of Agriculture. As I was written today by two lawyers I consulted and are specialists in Copyright Brazilian Law: “At the moment when CAFIB registered the CAFIB breed Standard to be followed and published its own Standard and the article “How to Distinguish a Pure Fila of a Half-breed”, it came into force immediately the copyright, which only ceases 70 or 100 years after the death of the author.”
I conclude this response with a quote from Albert Einstein himself: “The world is a dangerous place to live, not because of those who do evil, but because of those who observe and let evil happen.” That is, as I have said and practiced for the last 42 years Uncle Chico understands the Fila Brasileiro above clubs, in its racial/breed pureness, unique and united. For this reason I have been giving my constant contribution not to let “…evil happen…” against the real Puro Fila Brasileiro.
Hello, hello Anfibra founders: ask CAFIB soon to use the world-
renowned CAFIB Standard… and stop with these attitudes against
the Law. Just ask for a license…
Anfibra founders: if you wish, Uncle Chico makes a free of charge
Standard for Anfibra. After all, I’m not lazy and even before the CAFIB
foundation I already knew how to distinguish a Pure Fila from a
“mestizo-fila” with pedigree. Thing that much breeder who criticizes
me still does not know until today… Even with few litters born in my kennel,
I already knew how to identify a Pure Fila
via its phenotype. Moreover, it was I who
wrote the Standard of the Brazilian Mastiff… (http://www.filabrasileirochicopeltier.com.br/novos/pergunte_chico_3/materia_eng.html ).
- Uncle Chico, let me ask you: Andre Coltre, Mariana Dudeck and Renato Ferreira da Rocha have already argued your three articles below (*) where you defended the thesis that no more experiments with the so-called “black queue” should be done?
Uncle Chico’s Response:
Not that I know.
But what I can say is that they did not send me any email with a counter argument, or even comments or responses from them about these three articles signed by me.
Although:
- A) Renato sent me an email on “Sunday, September 25, 2016 17:46” in which he stated at the end: “I want to answer your Chico newsletters, but everything in time“.
I asked and waited for these comments and answers, but I did not get a return.
- B) Andre and Mariana posted on her face recently: “… we feel free to discuss different ideas …“, but I did not get a return.
I concludes then that our healthy exchange of ideas and many different thinking about the so called “black-fila” would continue. Unfortunately, I read this week in Mariana`s facebook (perhaps last Jan, 4th ) that even though they had nothing to discussed with me about the several points raised in my three articles listed below (*), regarding the validity of a new experiences with the “ black-fila“, decided unilaterally to stop our email exchanges since they posted: “… our (Andre’s and Mariana’s) conversations with him (Uncle Chico) ends here.”
That is, in my opinion, Andre and Mariana “finished” an exchange of ideas that was not even really started in practice, since in my three articles listed below (*), I comment on dozens of harms that in my view a new experience with the “black-fila” will bring to the True Fila Brasileiro; besides I asked some elementary questions about how this new experience would take place, such as:
– Do you have the resources, funds and time available to achieve this goal ?
– Do you have the support of scientists and specialists ?
– Do you have the support of the CBKC or any University ?
– If you want to get to the “black-fila” why the first cross of your experience happened with a yellow female of origin of the Fila Roots Kennel?
– Will you register at the CBKC only the puppies that are within the “black-fila” characteristics idealized by you, including the color black, or will register all the pups of the
litter, regardless color and type?
– What will you do with the puppies that at 12 months of age do not agree with the phenotypic characteristics idealized by you?
– What kind of control and registration do you intend to do?
– What do you intend to do with the dogs that happen to be born with the harlequin color ?
– How do you intend to control the existence and non-propagation of a “ black-fila “, fruit of crosses made by you, but outside the type idealized by you, inside the CBKC-FCI System ?
– How do you intend to control the next generations of crossings of these “ black-fila ” idealized by you?
– Are you intending to sell your first offspring as “black-fila” even though you were not the type that you have already settled for?
– Are you sure that it would not be much easier and more effective to administer and control your experience outside the CBKC-FCI System, as did the CAFIB outside the BKC-CBKC-FCI and the breeders of the American Bulldog outside the AKC, since the purpose of CBKC and AKC is primarily to increase their revenues ?
– In how many years do you think you will reach and definitively fix the phenotypic “black-fila” idealized by you?
– Or are you not at all concerned with the important points rose above and have entered into this experience with no responsibility, without a correct and previously defined serious plan of execution?
So I now reassure my readers: no, I have not received any comment or reply to these important points and many others raised by me in my three articles below (*).
Thus, I am obliged to understand that because Andre, Mariana, and Renato had no reason to argue my solid and logical arguments, they preferred to unilaterally terminate the discussion that did not actually begin, without stumbling over their own explanations and the non-existence of their basic work plan.
The fact, my dear friends, is that since 1974 I have unfortunately accompanied many “saviors of the Fila” inventing fashion for the Fila Brasileiro. They do a lot of nonsense and then disappear. But the damage they do remains to this day. This fake “saviors” forgets to do just the right thing. That is, to preserve the Fila Brasileiro as we inherited from Mother Nature ! This is the almost 40 year success of CAFIB !!!
Without false magic, quick shortcuts or commercial artifacts !!!
In the past, these false and foolish “saviors of the Fila” have mixed the Fila Brasileiro with various races under the most diverse pretenses that have never been sustained. Trying to create and manufacturing the “giant-docile-fila” came among many others like the “stocky-fila “, the “black-fila” and even the ” “freak-fila ” among many other type of “mestizos-filas”. Others fake to get the purebred Fila by crossing several “mestizos-filas” (pure by cross) and arrived at the “not Pure by crossing”… Others have argued that Fila Brasileiro does not constitute a breed, but rather a group of crossbred and mestizos dogs with pedigree (!!!), others suggested that all registrations of all Fila clubs be transferred to a Brazilian club that does not even exist anymore… And all genealogical control – that is, only the one done by CAFIB, since it is the only club that has actually existed for 38 years and its pedigrees reflects reality – would have been lost.
Now try the “neo-black-fila” !!! How silly. Only the obtuse and omit CBKC accepts to register any large dog as if it were Fila ($$$)…
Then the most foolish ones appear and they release a “mistaken and non-sense Granada“… saying that Uncle Chico is responsible for the division of the Fila Breed… And others obtusely complain that the new breeders are moving away from the Fila Brasileiro to others breeds… Well, are moving away because of these enormous nonsense. Not because of CAFIB, Dr. Paulo Santos Cruz, Paulo Godinho’s book, Inês Van Damme’s book or Uncle Chico website and blog !!!
And then Uncle Chico is obliged to clarify once again all these great nonsense practiced against the Fila Brasileiro…
(*) So that you can evaluate and draw your own conclusions, here are three links to the three articles mentioned above, still unanswered, where I defend the thesis that Andre, Mariana and Renato should not make new experiences with the so-called “neo-black-fila“:
– https://filabrasileirochicopeltierblog.wordpress.com/2016/09/12/post-n-403-tio-chico-informa-no-149-meus-comentarios-sobre-email-recebido-de-mariana-dudeck-e-andre-coltre-no-dia-100916-sobre-as-experiencias-que-eles-pretendem-fazer-com-o-chamado/
– https://filabrasileirochicopeltierblog.wordpress.com/2016/09/15/post-n-404-tio-chico-informa-no-149-que-perguntas-aqueles-que-desejam-inventar-um-novo-tipo-de-fila-preto-penso-que-deveriam-responder-a-si-mesmos-antes-de-iniciarem-mais-esta-experienci/
– https://filabrasileirochicopeltierblog.wordpress.com/2016/09/17/post-n-405-tio-chico-informa-no-150-que-caracteristicas-indesejaveis-acompanham-a-cor-preta-no-chamado-fila-preto-data-170916/
After all, as Dr. Jose Souto Maior Borges, one of the oldest members of CAFIB, wrote with extreme precision: “black-fila” = wood iron… “.
See in English clicking in: http://www.filabrasileirochicopeltier.com.br/novos/30_7/materia_eng.html
Or at the CAFIB newspaper O FIILA in http://www.filabrasileirochicopeltier.com.br/7-Cao-Preto-x-Fila-Puro/7/materia.html or in my website in http://www.filabrasileirochicopeltier.com.br/7.html
I’m very sorry, but if Andre Coltre, Mariana Dudeck and Renato Ferreira da Rocha changed their minds and no longer wish to continue discussing this matter. I have only to respect this decision. No problem. As I have already informed dozens of times, I do not take anything about the Fila Brasileiro personally, and I also thought, think and will think about a Fila Brasileiro as a bred dog, above clubs and united.
Do you know what a friend of mine wrote about this adventure and pretension of Andre Coltre and Mariana Dudeck, owners of the Kennel Onceiro Paulista, to carry out new experiences with the so-called “black-fila” ? “Funny, since they want to invent the” black-fila” academically, well, they are 30 years behind… Why do not they invent a black molosso type of dog, and call it Onceiro Paulista Dog, or Onceiro Brasileiro Dog ?” And I add: if Andre, Mariana and Renato really believing in their theories and beliefs, why not start their own club and leave the CBKC-FCI System ? I think that anyone who really believes in a theory must run after realizing their dream. Why not do exactly as CAFIB did: broke their ties with BKC-CBKC-FCI and go to work !!!
For all this total lack of logic and argumentation and abandonment to talk…
Translation of the above post into English:
Tks a lot, Chico Peltier.
Note: as I have always done with all emails sent in the past, this was also sent primarily to those responsible for FCI + CBKC
